Collision Conference: Smart investment or unnecessary expense?

The 'Olympics of Tech' are returning to Toronto this June, but as with any Olympic event, the arrival comes with tons of baggage. The Collision Conference is set to put the city on the global map, but not without a hefty price tag. While some argue it's worth every penny, others beg to differ. Should Toronto continue to play ball with Collision, or is it finally time to let it crash and burn? We’ll let you be the judge.

The Pulse Results (26 Votes) 📈

Side A 54% - Collision is a smart investment that puts Toronto on the world’s tech radar

Side B 46% - Collision is an unnecessary expense; we should be supporting our homegrown conferences

Poll closed: May 31, 2023

Published on: May 18, 2023
Published by: The Globe and Mail – Opinion

Get ready, Toronto! The highly anticipated Collision Conference, AKA ‘The Olympics of Tech’, is making a grand return this June. With over 33,000 attendees from 140 countries, including investors, startups, journalists, and even celebrities… this four-day tech conference is definitely giving the city something to talk about.

Featuring keynotes by renowned speakers, thought-provoking panels, educational sessions, and unparalleled networking opportunities, Collision promises to be an event like no other. However, conversations surrounding Collision are not all rainbows and gummy bears.

The future of Collision in Toronto remains unclear, as negotiations about a 3-year contract renewal are currently underway, with Collision demanding a whopping $16 million per year to stay in Toronto.

Organizations are lobbying for government support, arguing that the event is a worthwhile investment that helps put Toronto on the world’s tech radar. On the other hand, others are arguing that supporting homegrown conferences should be our number one priority.

Should the city secure the necessary funding for Collision to return, or is it time for it to peace-out of Toronto? It’s too soon to tell what the future has in store, but one thing is for sure – there are a collision of opinions surrounding this event!

The Debate Showdown

Side A: Collision is a smart investment that puts Toronto on the world’s tech radar

  • ​Collision shines a spotlight on Canada and puts us on the global tech map, supporting Collision shows our commitment to innovation and our drive to be a leader in the global tech game.

  • Hosting Collision makes it easier for Canadians to access and attend. In the past, it may have been impossible for them to have that opportunity when it was held internationally.

  • Talk about a money-maker! With over 33,000 attendees flocking to Collision, in need of accommodations, food, clothing... you can bet they're spending big bucks in Toronto.

  • Collision is a networking dream! It gives our local tech community and startups access to prime connections with influential people and companies from all over the world. These connections could even lead to serious funding that they may not have otherwise had access to locally.

  • Collision's global exposure attracts more companies and investments to our city. So, our investment in the conference will pay itself back tenfold with a thriving economy down the road.

  • We can still support and attend homegrown conferences, but they will never bring the crowds or clout that Collision does.

Side B: Collision is an unnecessary expense; we should be supporting our homegrown conferences

  • We can’t claim to want to support Canadians, but then actively bid against them by funding an international organization. We should be supporting and investing-in our local conferences. It's time to shift the spotlight and give Canadian events the recognition they deserve.

  • Collision's hefty financial demands and global bidding wars are borderline extortionist. They don’t genuinely care about Canada’s tech ecosystem; they just care about lining their pockets with money from whichever city is willing to pay them most to host them.

  • Why not use that money to invest in initiatives that directly benefit our local tech ecosystem? Like grants, funding incubators, and research and development.

  • Homegrown conferences could easily bring in the same masses that Collision does, if they had the same funding.

  • By supporting our homegrown conferences, we strengthen our networks, encourage collaboration, and create a sustainable ecosystem for continuous innovation. All while keeping costs lower.

  • We should be focusing on the long-term sustainability and growth of our tech ecosystem rather than relying solely on a single, expensive event for attention. This feels like a fad that’s going to eventually fade.

Key Takeaways:

Previous Debate

Previous Pulse Results (51 Votes) 📈

Side A 45% - Social media use helps young adolescents

Side B 55% - Social media use harms young adolescents